MicroTESK

h1. Development Milestones

h2. Version 2 (deadline: 31/08/2014)

MicroTESK v2 should fully support instruction set specifications and random/combinatorial template-based test program generation. This is the minimal functionality that makes the MicroTESK tool useful.

| *Version 2.0* | *30/04/2014* | *Features:* nML-based instruction set specification, test situations, exceptions, initialization code, branching instructions |

* _Test Situations_

** Manual description of test situations in Java and XML should be supported

** Test situations should be accessible from test templates (corresponding solvers should be invoked, and generated data should be substituted into the test program)

** Each instruction should have a top-level test situation (by default, the top-level situation is @Random@)

** There should be a configuration file assigning top-level test situations to instructions (@Random@, @Zero@, etc.)

* _Initialization Code_

** Manual specification of initialization code (for each access mode) should be supported

** Automated extraction of initialization code (for each access mode) should be implemented

* _Exceptions_

** Mechanism for specifying exceptions should be clarified (probably, a predefined function, like @RaiseException@, should be introduced)

** Means for describing exception handling logic should be added

* _Branch Instructions_

** Facilities for defining/using labels in test templates should be revisited

** Combinatorial test program generation based on test templates with branch instructions should be implemented

* _Examples_

** A test template with branch instructions (combinatorial generation)

* _Documentation_

** All new facilities should be documented

| *Version 2.1* | *31/05/2014* | *Features:* VLIW specification and testing, register aliases, self-checking test program generation |

* _Specification_

** Auxiliary nML constructs, like @alias@, should be enabled

** Mechanisms for calling operations in operations should be implemented

** Means for specifying VLIW architectures (e.g., Elbrus) should be added

* _Testing_

** Mechanisms for calling test templates in test templates should be implemented

** Generation of self-checking test programs should be supported

** Means for writting test templates for VLIW architectures should be added

* _Examples_

** A fragment of the Elbrus architecture should specified

** Some test templates for the Elbrus architecture should be written

* _Documentation_

** All new facilities should be documented

| *Version 2.2* | *30/06/2014* | *Features:* test situation composition/decomposition/iteration, test coverage extraction, constrained-random test data generation |

* _Test Situation Composition_

** Disjunctive composition of test situations should be supported (random choice of a test situation based on biases)

** Conjunctive composition of test situations should be supported (there should possibility to specify hard and soft constraints)

* _Test Situation Decomposition_

** Means for splitting test situations into disjunctions of implicants should be implemented (BDD-based and other test generation algorithms can be applied): @rule(situation)@

** The set of decomposition rules should be extensible

* _Test Situation Iteration_

** Means for iterating test situations should be implemented: @iterate(disjuntive_situation)@, @iterator(rule(situation))@ or @iterate(situation1, situation2, ...)@

* _Test Coverage Extraction_

** For each instruction and for each path in its CFG, the corresponding test situation should be constructed

** For each instruction, the top-level test situation should be constructed as the disjunctive composition of the extracted test situations

* _Examples_

** A test situation composition example should be added

** A test situation decomposition example should be added

** A test situation iteration example should be added

* _Documentation_

** All new facilities should be documented

| *Version 2.3* | *31/08/2014* | *Features:* integration with TestBase, Eclipse-based development environment, test program tracing |

* _TestBase Project_

** Functions for structuring/composing/decomposing/... test situations should be separated into the TestBase project

** Additional test generation facilities should be implemented

* _MicroTESK IDE_

** An Eclipse plugin should be implemented (including an nML editor, instructions/situations viewers, test template wizards, compiler/generator launchers, etc.)

* _Tracing_

** A trace format should be developed

** Trace utilities should be implemented and integrated into the test program generator

* _Documentation_

** All new facilities should be documented

* _Promotion_

** The miniMIPS microprocessor should be specified

** Test templates for the miniMIPS microprocessor should be written

** The test program generator should be added into the miniMIPS project at OpenCores

h2. Version 3 (Deadline: 31/08/2015)

MicroTESK v3 should support microarchitectural specifications and automated test template generation. The tool should be extended to complex multicore microprocessors with cache coherence support.

| *Version 3.0* | *31/12/2014* | *Features:* memory management, caching, address translation |

* _Microarchitectural Specifications_

** Specification of memory management units should supported

| *Version 3.1* | *31/05/2015* | *Features:* pipelining, microarchitectural networks |

* _Internal Representation_

** Internal representation should be unified with the Retrascope''s one

| *Version 3.2* | *31/08/2015* | *Features:* multicore microprocessors, Promela, cache coherence |

* _Multicore Microprocessors_

** Integration with Promela specifications should be implemented

_To be continued..._