Project

General

Profile

Bug #9374

ru.ispras.microtesk.model.powerpc.autogen.BoundaryTestCase: Simulation failedThe CPR storage is not defined in the model.ru.ispras.microtesk.model.ConfigurationException: The CPR storage is not defined in the model.

Added by Sergey Smolov over 1 year ago. Updated 5 months ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Target version:
-
Start date:
11/08/2018
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Detected in build:
master
Platform:
Published in build:
0.0.4-alpha-191229

Description

java.lang.AssertionError: ********************************************************************************
ATTENTION! An unexpected error has occurred:
java.lang.AssertionError: Error: Simulation failedThe CPR storage is not defined in the model.ru.ispras.microtesk.model.ConfigurationException: The CPR storage is not defined in the model.
    at ru.ispras.microtesk.model.ProcessingElement.getStorage(ProcessingElement.java:190)
    at ru.ispras.microtesk.model.ProcessingElement.accessLocation(ProcessingElement.java:119)
    at ru.ispras.microtesk.test.template.Output$ArgumentLocation.evaluate(Output.java:162)
    at ru.ispras.microtesk.test.template.Output.evaluate(Output.java:298)
    at ru.ispras.microtesk.test.Executor.logCall(Executor.java:497)
    at ru.ispras.microtesk.test.Executor.executeCall(Executor.java:443)
    at ru.ispras.microtesk.test.Executor.executeToBreak(Executor.java:348)
    at ru.ispras.microtesk.test.Executor.execute(Executor.java:276)
    at ru.ispras.microtesk.test.TemplateProcessor.runExecution(TemplateProcessor.java:707)
    at ru.ispras.microtesk.test.TemplateProcessor.processPostponedBlock(TemplateProcessor.java:428)
    at ru.ispras.microtesk.test.TemplateProcessor.processPostponedBlocks(TemplateProcessor.java:306)
    at ru.ispras.microtesk.test.TemplateProcessor.finish(TemplateProcessor.java:194)
    at ru.ispras.microtesk.test.template.Template.endMainSection(Template.java:214)

History

#1

Updated by Alexander Protsenko 6 months ago

  • Status changed from New to Resolved

fixed 8aaf1638

#2

Updated by Sergey Smolov 6 months ago

Is this test case incorrect?

#3

Updated by Sergey Smolov 5 months ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to Verified
#4

Updated by Sergey Smolov 5 months ago

  • Published in build set to 0.0.4-alpha-191229
  • Status changed from Verified to Closed

The test has been removed, I close the ticket.

Also available in: Atom PDF