Klever

I would say names are correct but inconvenient. It does not violate any implemented use cases according to my knowledge.

I suggested to use NativeWorker (LocalWorker) rather than client and scheduler-client.

Besides all files and directories belonging to scheduler components and their configuration files should be named using the same ground. All references from documentation, comments and log messages also should be fixed.

At last I suggested to separate workers and schedulers explicitly. One example of that is Core that is just a worker back-end to solve jobs.