Actions
Bug #6365
closedsrc/test/vhdl/example/example.vhd: IllegalArgumentException
Start date:
10/23/2015
Due date:
% Done:
100%
Estimated time:
Detected in build:
svn
Platform:
Published in build:
0.2.1
Description
The EfsmUtils.product
method do not remain variables that are declared not in EFSM's, but in their ancestors.
This fact causes the following exception:
2015.10.23 14:53:30.098. INFO: Options: {efsm=<efsm>, args=/home/ssedai/projects/retrascope.svn/build/resources/test/example/example.vhd --target conflicts --toplevel example --search-type BFS --search-depth 10} 2015.10.23 14:53:30.098. INFO: EFSM Conflict Extractor: Starting 2015.10.23 14:53:30.099. INFO: EFSM Conflict Extractor: Examining: EXAMPLE_0, EXAMPLE_1 2015.10.23 14:53:30.119. INFO: EFSM Conflict Extractor: Duplicating variables: 0 2015.10.23 14:53:30.119. INFO: EFSM Conflict Extractor: Examining: EXAMPLE_0, EXAMPLE_2 2015.10.23 14:53:30.119. INFO: EFSM Conflict Extractor: Duplicating variables: 0 2015.10.23 14:53:30.119. INFO: EFSM Conflict Extractor: Examining: EXAMPLE_0, WORK.DRIVER(BEHAV).DRIVER1_4 2015.10.23 14:53:30.120. INFO: EFSM Conflict Extractor: Duplicating variables: 0 2015.10.23 14:53:30.120. INFO: EFSM Conflict Extractor: Examining: EXAMPLE_0, WORK.TEST(BEHAVIORAL).TEST1_3 2015.10.23 14:53:30.120. INFO: EFSM Conflict Extractor: Duplicating variables: 0 2015.10.23 14:53:30.120. INFO: EFSM Conflict Extractor: Examining: EXAMPLE_1, EXAMPLE_2 2015.10.23 14:53:30.121. INFO: EFSM Conflict Extractor: Duplicating variables: 0 2015.10.23 14:53:30.121. INFO: EFSM Conflict Extractor: Examining: EXAMPLE_1, WORK.DRIVER(BEHAV).DRIVER1_4 2015.10.23 14:53:30.121. INFO: EFSM Conflict Extractor: Duplicating variables: 1 2015.10.23 14:53:30.121. INFO: EFSM Conflict Extractor: Z 2015.10.23 14:53:30.121. INFO: EFSM Conflict Extractor: Transitions: 4 2015.10.23 14:53:30.125. INFO: EFSM Conflict Extractor: Examining: EXAMPLE_1, WORK.TEST(BEHAVIORAL).TEST1_3 2015.10.23 14:53:30.126. INFO: EFSM Conflict Extractor: Duplicating variables: 0 2015.10.23 14:53:30.126. INFO: EFSM Conflict Extractor: Examining: EXAMPLE_2, WORK.DRIVER(BEHAV).DRIVER1_4 2015.10.23 14:53:30.126. INFO: EFSM Conflict Extractor: Duplicating variables: 0 2015.10.23 14:53:30.127. INFO: EFSM Conflict Extractor: Examining: EXAMPLE_2, WORK.TEST(BEHAVIORAL).TEST1_3 2015.10.23 14:53:30.127. INFO: EFSM Conflict Extractor: Duplicating variables: 1 2015.10.23 14:53:30.127. INFO: EFSM Conflict Extractor: C 2015.10.23 14:53:30.127. INFO: EFSM Conflict Extractor: Transitions: 5 2015.10.23 14:53:30.134. INFO: EFSM Conflict Extractor: Examining: WORK.DRIVER(BEHAV).DRIVER1_4, WORK.TEST(BEHAVIORAL).TEST1_3 There is no declaration of variable RESET neither in this EFSM nor in its ancestors. java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: There is no declaration of variable RESET neither in this EFSM nor in its ancestors. at ru.ispras.retrascope.model.efsm.Efsm.processAddedExpression(Efsm.java:647) at ru.ispras.retrascope.model.efsm.Efsm.createTransition(Efsm.java:227) at ru.ispras.retrascope.model.efsm.EfsmUtils.product(EfsmUtils.java:345) at ru.ispras.retrascope.engine.efsm.extractor.conflict.EfsmConflictExtractor.searchConflicts(EfsmConflictExtractor.java:212) at ru.ispras.retrascope.engine.efsm.extractor.conflict.EfsmConflictExtractor.start(EfsmConflictExtractor.java:169) at ru.ispras.retrascope.basis.Engine.start(Engine.java:217) at ru.ispras.retrascope.basis.ToolChain.start(ToolChain.java:110) at ru.ispras.retrascope.basis.Engine.start(Engine.java:217) at ru.ispras.retrascope.Retrascope$ToolRun.start(Retrascope.java:199) at ru.ispras.retrascope.Retrascope.main(Retrascope.java:375) at ru.ispras.retrascope.Retrascope.main(Retrascope.java:395) at ru.ispras.retrascope.util.VhdlUtilTest.runRetrascope(VhdlUtilTest.java:169) at ru.ispras.retrascope.util.VhdlUtilTest.runVhdl(VhdlUtilTest.java:81) at ru.ispras.retrascope.engine.efsm.extractor.conflict.EfsmConflictExtractorTestCase.test(EfsmConflictExtractorTestCase.java:54) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44) at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:76) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236)
Updated by Mikhail Lebedev about 9 years ago
- Status changed from New to Resolved
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Fixed, revision 2540.
Updated by Sergey Smolov about 9 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Verified
Updated by Sergey Smolov almost 9 years ago
- Status changed from Verified to Closed
- Published in build set to 0.2.1
Actions