Project

General

Profile

Actions

Feature #3204

closed

Do not use BLAST specific in models and special LDV subroutines

Added by Evgeny Novikov over 12 years ago. Updated over 12 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
High
Start date:
07/13/2012
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Published in build:
1f558ed

Description

When there was just BLAST static verifier, we created models for this engine. We use 'blast' in model names, in models itself, in general subroutines (primarily via "engine-blast.h" and "engine-blast-assert.h" headers).
But some time ago we began to use CPAchecker static verifier. And we have heard questions like: "Why is CPAchecker fails when blast_assert() function is called?" and so on.
I have developed a special general header defining special LDV subroutines ("ldv.h"). And I'm going to remove any BLAST specific from models while fixing issue #453 that touches all models anyway.


Related issues 1 (0 open1 closed)

Blocks C Instrumentation Framework - Bug #453: ri: aspect common file should be element of united aspect fileClosedEvgeny Novikov09/23/2010

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by Vadim Mutilin over 12 years ago

  • Assignee changed from Eugene Shatokhin to Evgeny Novikov
Actions #2

Updated by Evgeny Novikov over 12 years ago

  • Status changed from Open to Resolved

Commit 23cf3a2 of bug-453 branch has fixed the issue. It will be tested soon and merged to master as well as bug-453 branch.

Actions #3

Updated by Evgeny Novikov over 12 years ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to Closed
  • Published in build set to 1f558ed

It was merged to master in commit:f9f0431 and works stable since commit:1f558ed.

Don't forget to remove installed into prefix LDV tools, otherwise you will be able to use the old BLAST specific interface that after all leads to errors.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF